Have they scrapped this completely?

Only I thought Wigan should've been awarded a penalty try for a ball steal in the act of scoring (even though the ref deemed it to be a knock on)

They scrapped it for ball steals about 7 or 8 years ago.

I don't think ball steal has ever qualified for a penalty try. (Edit, well, for about 7 or 8 years anyway

)

It was lost in the tackle, onus on the attacking player to keep hold of the ball which he failed to do

Yep, but even if it was an actual 2 on 1 ball steal it wouldn't have been a penalty try, just a penalty.

powell should have had more control of the ball according to bentham who was video ref, he didnt, try ruled out correctly as a knock on

They ruled it as a loose carry. Debatable one, I can see both points of view and can't make my mind up whether it was the right call or not.

Certainly wasn't a penalty try as that rule has changed.

But by definition of a penalty try, the 2 on 1 ball steal (had it been deemed as a ball steal) prevented Powell of scoring. The defending team had committed an offence in the act of scoring.

Anyway in the end it didn't matter.

It's an oddity I agree. If you prevent a try by committing a foul then it's a penalty try in my book.

Don't think Haughton tried to steal the ball though. Think he was trying to tackle/stop him. If in the opinion of the ref he hasn't deliberately gone for the ball then if it comes out as s consequence of a defender making a genuine attempt at a tackle then it's a loose carry.

I thought the ball steal rules didn't apply to a attacker in the act of attempting to score a try. Or is that just in the NRL?

If Powell had curled his fingers round the ball like he did when shoving them into Lineham's eye, he might not have lost it.

I was amused by the Sky lot, before the replay that showed the ball coming free, they said "his momentum took him over, there was no attempt to promote the ball", just as the first replay showed Powell lifting his arm to try to reach over to put the ball down.