You don't sign players to "send a message". You sign them to improve the team. If someone fits that bill, and if the budget can be made available (not a sure thing given how much money the club loses, this is going to be £150/£200k/whatever over the planned spend) then yes definitely go out and get them.

Hastings seems to cause trouble wherever he goes,Pryce is a knob and not entirely sure we want Rowley at Leeds either

Hetherington is standing down to take over at London after an NRL takeover of the club is due to go through in the coming weeks.  Matt Adamson will also be involved.  https://www.patreon.com/posts/124267448?pr=true

Hetherington is standing down to take over at London after an NRL takeover of the club is due to go through in the coming weeks.  Matt Adamson will also be involved.  https://www.patreon.com/posts/124267448?pr=true

Players who want showing the door if we want to compete again at the highest level:




Newman - most overhyped/rated player we have ever produced. Not even in Vince Fawcett league.
Croft - poor signing not produced the good at all, not worth any transfer fee.
Frawley - just not anywhere near good enough
Akers - as with Croft not worth any transfer fee O’Connor vastly superior
Lisone - not even a flat track bully we were better with Sanger
Bentley - worst domestic signing I have ever seen we must have better in the reserves
Cameron Smith - not and never will be good enough at 13, (Gannon for me here) unless we move him to prop and see what he can do there.
ECW - project taking an overseas spot. We have far better prospects who deserve the game time.



These are also some of our biggest earners as well and week in week out are some of our worse performers. 

Agree with everyone bar Croft. How do we take so many good players and make them look crap?