|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 686 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2006 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote MadDogg="MadDogg"The new limits around minutes players can play must be a nightmare for coaches to adhere to.
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ex ... -from-2024
I definitely don't have the headspace or motivation to keep track of it but I'm sure we and other clubs have had backs playing more than 25 games? If anything it means you're punished for going longer in the two domestic competitions. Might it mean we have to rest our first teamers more this year because we won all the trophies last year?'"
its going to be an absolute nightmare to manage.
One scenario I just thought of and its related to how you can use the following seasons allowance in advance if you progress through cups, playoffs and internationals etc...
Just say Wigan agree to sell a player to say Warrington. Wigan could then, knowing that player is going to Warrington next season, use as many minutes of the allowance as possible. That would result in one of two scenarios:
1 - Warrington having less minutes available the next season (doesn't feel right does it...the same could happen to us)
2 - Warrington use the following seasons allocation (If that is possible, where does it end? When they retire, go to the NRL or get a big injury) |
|
Quote MadDogg="MadDogg"The new limits around minutes players can play must be a nightmare for coaches to adhere to.
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ex ... -from-2024
I definitely don't have the headspace or motivation to keep track of it but I'm sure we and other clubs have had backs playing more than 25 games? If anything it means you're punished for going longer in the two domestic competitions. Might it mean we have to rest our first teamers more this year because we won all the trophies last year?'"
its going to be an absolute nightmare to manage.
One scenario I just thought of and its related to how you can use the following seasons allowance in advance if you progress through cups, playoffs and internationals etc...
Just say Wigan agree to sell a player to say Warrington. Wigan could then, knowing that player is going to Warrington next season, use as many minutes of the allowance as possible. That would result in one of two scenarios:
1 - Warrington having less minutes available the next season (doesn't feel right does it...the same could happen to us)
2 - Warrington use the following seasons allocation (If that is possible, where does it end? When they retire, go to the NRL or get a big injury) | |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| First Team Player | 1381 | St. Helens |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2022 | 4 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
I think there's no question that Wigan's Academy isn't as strong this season. However you don't need all of the team to come through to first team, just needs 3-4 who are real class to step up which I'm sure will happen at Wigan. At any club it's rare to find more than that number within a squad, making it at first team level
Your scholars are very strong which will form the basis of your next Academy
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Junior Player | 81 | Wigan Warriors |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2025 | 1 year | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2025 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
These things can also be mitigated with smart signings (like we've done with Walters), but it's much cheaper to bring someone through though.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Junior Player | 81 | Wigan Warriors |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2025 | 1 year | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2025 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Seems like plenty of our rivals are making moves to bring in new bodies before the end of the season.
We’re desperately in need of a freshen-up, but we’re not even being linked with anyone. Radlinski seems hell-bent on watching the season go down the toilet.
I’d have taken Shorrocks on loan – even if it meant giving Ellis a week off, or moving him up to prop for a week or two. A fresh body, a bit of a lift for the squad, something different.
And before anyone starts with “what about the cap” – how is it that other sides seem able to move players on, yet we can’t? Could Chan not have been shifted? Did we really need to carry Hurst’s contract for a season knowing he wouldn’t play? Saints are being linked with a new signing, but before he can come in someone needs to vacate a quota spot. What are the odds on them actually getting it done?
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 8226 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
We probably don't have any cap space. So many players have had their contracts renewed it's bound to affect the salary cap.
Trouble is our two highest paid players and them being two of our three marquee players haven't played for months. French has been out for a couple of months and Thompson since the Catalans game when we also lost Walters. Although Walters has returned he was out for around 10-11 weeks Thompson still hasn't played. That is just too much talent missing from the squad not to have an adverse effect on performance..
If there was a shake up needed then Forber to be bench 9 instead of Leeming. Walters right 2nd row and Junior off the bench. Maybe also Eckersley to replace Wardle for a couple of weeks so get Jake rested and fit again.
IMO our first 17-20 is the best in SL and by some distance. For that to be reflected in performance they all have to play especially our best players which they plainly have not.
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 228 | Wigan Warriors |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Oct 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| MadDoggFather Ted:
We probably don't have any cap space. So many players have had their contracts renewed it's bound to affect the salary cap.
Trouble is our two highest paid players and them being two of our three marquee players haven't played for months. French has been out for a couple of months and Thompson since the Catalans game when we also lost Walters. Although Walters has returned he was out for around 10-11 weeks Thompson still hasn't played. That is just too much talent missing from the squad not to have an adverse effect on performance..
If there was a shake up needed then Forber to be bench 9 instead of Leeming. Walters right 2nd row and Junior off the bench. Maybe also Eckersley to replace Wardle for a couple of weeks so get Jake rested and fit again.
IMO our first 17-20 is the best in SL and by some distance. For that to be reflected in performance they all have to play especially our best players which they plainly have not.
Not a bad shout that but for me it would be Forber instead of O Neil |
|
|
|
|
|
